I remember watching a news story several years ago about the musical Hamilton and feeling really uncomfortable with how it was cast. Black actors portraying aristocrats that socialized with Alexander Hamilton? It just didn't happen.
I am not alone in my feelings on this. As this article points out,
"The performance drew plenty of skeptics. Then-Daily Show host Jon Stewart, in a segment that has aged like asbestos, roundly mocked Miranda and the other poets of color featured in the event, snarking, “You’ve been dissed, disrespected, disenfranchised, but ’dis? Is kind of ridiculous.”
Hamilton went on to break box-office records but it attracted a lot of criticism, too.
Here's a little reminder: In that day and time (the late 18th century) most African Americans were either enslaved. If they were free, they typically worked at very modest jobs like maids or perhaps tradespeople like blacksmiths or seamstresses or farm workers. There was no black aristocracy, except perhaps in New Orleans.
The sort of revisionist history seen in Hamilton or the newer Netflix series Hollywood is really inaccurate and it bothers me on a lot of levels.
Now, I am the child of two parents who liked history and read a lot of history. My father was an avid and voracious reader and a 5 lb. tome about the life of Winston Churchill or George S. Patton was a gift he would delve into immediately after opening.
I was taught to revere history at an early age.
While in the car, we always pulled over to read those historic markers by the side of the road. Dad always took us to Civil War battlefields and any sort of naval vessel the public could tour. We watched movies set in historical time periods. I loved to read biographies of famous women like Eleanor Roosevelt and Clara Barton.
Now that I am a writer, I am diligent about doing my research and trying to portray accurately what life was like in the recent past or the distant past. I did a lot of research for my novel Heart of My Own Heart.
Hamilton and Hollywood are trying to cast more actors of color in key roles and level the playing field in terms of job opportunities. I understand that motivation and I applaud the idea, just not the execution of it. The system has long been biased and it needed to change. I just don't think the way history is being rewritten is a good thing.
Imagine you are a child (not knowing much about American History) and you see Hamilton. It appears as though he had peers who were African American. They seemed to sing hip hop. You will come away thinking that the portrayals in Hamilton are accurate. Perhaps you watch the series Bridgerton, which also has black actors portraying members of the British nobility in the 18th century -- and it's completely inaccurate. How does that feel later on when you learn in school that Hamilton and Bridgerton ignored actual history, and most of your ancestors were likely slaves or laborers or farmers?
Hollywood is an interesting series but it portrays a lot of somewhat graphic sex and no child should be watching it, but if they are, they are getting a similarly inaccurate vision of Hollywood in the late 1940's, early 1950's. It was almost impossible for even very talented non-white actors and actresses to get good roles and the recognition they deserved. That's really unfortunate but it is how things were back then. For instance, Hattie McDaniel won an Oscar for her role in Gone With the Wind but couldn't sit in the auditorium with her peers, due to racism.
In Hollywood, the series, a movie is made that features a black actress, written by a black screenwriter, and it breaks box office records and wins a slew of awards. That's a nice fantasy, but it's doubtful that would have been the outcome even if a studio had dared to try that. Also, it's a slap in the face to people who lived through those segregated, racist times.
Here's a disturbing thought. The implication is that if a studio had just cast a beautiful black actress in a lead role and taken a chance, all would have been well. There's no way of knowing that. It's easy to look back and say of industry executives back then You weren't brave enough to buck convention and just go for it -- but hindsight is 20/20. We shouldn't judge people living during a time it's hard for us to fathom. Black people who went against the mainstream were often beaten or lynched. White people who tried to change the status quo were also often targets of the KKK. That's a terrible truth but it's the truth. It didn't happen only in the south, either.
You could make the argument that all of history is inaccurate. It's always written by the winners. History must be portrayed as accurately as possible, however, in my opinion.
I feel strongly that entertainments should not portray history the way we would have liked for it to be. Future generations shouldn't be confused by a well-meaning but highly inaccurate depiction of historical facts and events. We owe it to subsequent generations to show how it really WAS, the good and the bad. To do anything else is dishonorable and just wrong, in my opinion.
One final thought...
Sydney Poitier actually broke the color barrier in the early 1950's, the first person of color starring in movies popular with all audiences. We should study his life and learn and be inspired by it.
Recent Comments